<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does #AmazonFAIL actually matter?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socialmediagroup.com/2009/04/14/does-amazonfail-actually-matter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socialmediagroup.com/2009/04/14/does-amazonfail-actually-matter/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Helping Business Navigate the Social Web.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:46:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Crisis Communications - what matters &#124; Social Media Group</title>
		<link>http://socialmediagroup.com/2009/04/14/does-amazonfail-actually-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-4563</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Crisis Communications - what matters &#124; Social Media Group</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediagroup.com/?p=856#comment-4563</guid>
		<description>[...] put something together that is accurate and meaningful? That addresses the issue? Not likely. And, as I posted about #AmazonFAIL, that will not change. You still need time to craft your message. But the point is, you don&#8217;t always have to have a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] put something together that is accurate and meaningful? That addresses the issue? Not likely. And, as I posted about #AmazonFAIL, that will not change. You still need time to craft your message. But the point is, you don&#8217;t always have to have a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: armpit44</title>
		<link>http://socialmediagroup.com/2009/04/14/does-amazonfail-actually-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-4566</link>
		<dc:creator>armpit44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 22:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediagroup.com/?p=856#comment-4566</guid>
		<description>Amazon sells dog fighting publications, so I wouldn&#039;t do biz with them. I say #Amazonfail forever!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazon sells dog fighting publications, so I wouldn&#8217;t do biz with them. I say #Amazonfail forever!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie Fox</title>
		<link>http://socialmediagroup.com/2009/04/14/does-amazonfail-actually-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-4578</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediagroup.com/?p=856#comment-4578</guid>
		<description>@peter, exactly my point - when there&#039;s no broader spread to the mainstream, will these tempests in tea pots eventually come and go without impact?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@peter, exactly my point &#8211; when there&#8217;s no broader spread to the mainstream, will these tempests in tea pots eventually come and go without impact?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kim</title>
		<link>http://socialmediagroup.com/2009/04/14/does-amazonfail-actually-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-4577</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 03:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediagroup.com/?p=856#comment-4577</guid>
		<description>The other side of velocity is that these issues evaporate as quickly as they boil up.  Maybe even faster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other side of velocity is that these issues evaporate as quickly as they boil up.  Maybe even faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maggiefox</title>
		<link>http://socialmediagroup.com/2009/04/14/does-amazonfail-actually-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-4576</link>
		<dc:creator>maggiefox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediagroup.com/?p=856#comment-4576</guid>
		<description>@sheila  without question, if the intent was purposeful the whole thing matters from a right/wrong perspective, I&#039;m with you there. However, I wanted to take the 30,000-foot view and assess whether the impact Twitter can have on brand reputation today will still be the case in six months after another dozen of these type of incidents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sheila  without question, if the intent was purposeful the whole thing matters from a right/wrong perspective, I&#8217;m with you there. However, I wanted to take the 30,000-foot view and assess whether the impact Twitter can have on brand reputation today will still be the case in six months after another dozen of these type of incidents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: contempt for the public? we haz it! &#171; Sting in the Tail</title>
		<link>http://socialmediagroup.com/2009/04/14/does-amazonfail-actually-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-4575</link>
		<dc:creator>contempt for the public? we haz it! &#171; Sting in the Tail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediagroup.com/?p=856#comment-4575</guid>
		<description>[...] left the below on a blog this morning that asked if the whole Amazonfail thing actually mattered. Yes, i think it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] left the below on a blog this morning that asked if the whole Amazonfail thing actually mattered. Yes, i think it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Evans</title>
		<link>http://socialmediagroup.com/2009/04/14/does-amazonfail-actually-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-4567</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 04:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediagroup.com/?p=856#comment-4567</guid>
		<description>Will it matter to the company in general? Long term? Probably not, but even if it is just a few thousand people talking about a serious error or questionable policy, it&#039;s worth addressing as soon as possible. In this world in 2009, people expect everyone to be available within hours tops. I do monitor my company&#039;s reputation even on weekends and evenings. If I were part of the Amazon team, I&#039;d want to sort it out and clarify within just hours, rather than days. We saw it with Motrin Moms and we&#039;ll see it with AmazonFail too... people are forgiving once they understand what happened or they get a genuine apology. People screw up. And it&#039;s kind of nice that social media may just be the thing that draws integrity out of people and companies whether they like it or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will it matter to the company in general? Long term? Probably not, but even if it is just a few thousand people talking about a serious error or questionable policy, it&#8217;s worth addressing as soon as possible. In this world in 2009, people expect everyone to be available within hours tops. I do monitor my company&#8217;s reputation even on weekends and evenings. If I were part of the Amazon team, I&#8217;d want to sort it out and clarify within just hours, rather than days. We saw it with Motrin Moms and we&#8217;ll see it with AmazonFail too&#8230; people are forgiving once they understand what happened or they get a genuine apology. People screw up. And it&#8217;s kind of nice that social media may just be the thing that draws integrity out of people and companies whether they like it or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carla Arrigo</title>
		<link>http://socialmediagroup.com/2009/04/14/does-amazonfail-actually-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-4568</link>
		<dc:creator>Carla Arrigo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 04:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediagroup.com/?p=856#comment-4568</guid>
		<description>I love the way information is spread so rapidly.  Information at twitter speed.  I am new to this twitter and loving it. I am amazed at the information that I have been able to tap into. 4TogetherEveryoneAchievesMoreHelpingOtherPeopleExcel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the way information is spread so rapidly.  Information at twitter speed.  I am new to this twitter and loving it. I am amazed at the information that I have been able to tap into. 4TogetherEveryoneAchievesMoreHelpingOtherPeopleExcel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheila (@stinginthetail)</title>
		<link>http://socialmediagroup.com/2009/04/14/does-amazonfail-actually-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-4573</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheila (@stinginthetail)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 01:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediagroup.com/?p=856#comment-4573</guid>
		<description>I was on Twitter over the Easter weekend, so saw #amazonfail take off - Amazon first said in email to an author that  &quot;the company was excluding “ ‘adult’ material from appearing in some searches and best-seller lists.”&quot; (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/14/technology/internet/14amazon.html)

For &#039;adult&#039;, read &#039;gay &amp; lesbian&#039; - there were anti-homosexual books still available, along with very adult sex toys, and hetero erotica - funny how the catalogue works, huh?

Then Amazon changed their tune (perhaps realising it didn&#039;t actually stand up to any serious scrutiny), and blamed a cataloguing error. It&#039;s laughable. I&#039;d take them seriously if they admitted someone had censored their lists of books, and they&#039;d now fired that person/s. Instead, we got dribble - which however well-worded is still corporate spin to control the damage. However, the damage to their reputation is ongoing - #amazonfail is still on Twitter.

In six months, i think people will still be picking up stories like this from the net - after all - it&#039;s news. Censorship, right wing religious views being forced on the book-buying public, and bigotry - it all works for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was on Twitter over the Easter weekend, so saw #amazonfail take off &#8211; Amazon first said in email to an author that  &#8220;the company was excluding “ ‘adult’ material from appearing in some searches and best-seller lists.”&#8221; (<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/14/technology/internet/14amazon.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/14/technology/internet/14amazon.html</a>)</p>
<p>For &#8216;adult&#8217;, read &#8216;gay &amp; lesbian&#8217; &#8211; there were anti-homosexual books still available, along with very adult sex toys, and hetero erotica &#8211; funny how the catalogue works, huh?</p>
<p>Then Amazon changed their tune (perhaps realising it didn&#8217;t actually stand up to any serious scrutiny), and blamed a cataloguing error. It&#8217;s laughable. I&#8217;d take them seriously if they admitted someone had censored their lists of books, and they&#8217;d now fired that person/s. Instead, we got dribble &#8211; which however well-worded is still corporate spin to control the damage. However, the damage to their reputation is ongoing &#8211; #amazonfail is still on Twitter.</p>
<p>In six months, i think people will still be picking up stories like this from the net &#8211; after all &#8211; it&#8217;s news. Censorship, right wing religious views being forced on the book-buying public, and bigotry &#8211; it all works for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Stuhmer</title>
		<link>http://socialmediagroup.com/2009/04/14/does-amazonfail-actually-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-4574</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Stuhmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 01:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediagroup.com/?p=856#comment-4574</guid>
		<description>Companies that react quickly (e.g., the Tylenol scare, to go back a little in time) will tend to fare better than their sluggish counterparts.  So does #AmazonFAIL matter?  Sure.  We had an event that popped up on the marketplace&#039;s radar and the company reacted fairly quickly.

Like many other applications, Twitter serves to increase transparency.  Twitter will evolve, social media will evolve, society will evolve, but it&#039;s a good guess that the trend toward transparency will continue and, if it does, future #AmazonFAIL-like events will matter too.  Companies can&#039;t expect that they can hide in the noise created by increased transparency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Companies that react quickly (e.g., the Tylenol scare, to go back a little in time) will tend to fare better than their sluggish counterparts.  So does #AmazonFAIL matter?  Sure.  We had an event that popped up on the marketplace&#8217;s radar and the company reacted fairly quickly.</p>
<p>Like many other applications, Twitter serves to increase transparency.  Twitter will evolve, social media will evolve, society will evolve, but it&#8217;s a good guess that the trend toward transparency will continue and, if it does, future #AmazonFAIL-like events will matter too.  Companies can&#8217;t expect that they can hide in the noise created by increased transparency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

